In November 2000, mobile phones changed forever: the first camera phone appeared.

Within three years, more people had camera phones than standard digital cameras. And the bulbs behind the flash units in these camera phones were mostly LEDs.

LEDs vs Xenon

Back in the early years of the century, camera phone manufacturers could have opted for Xenon bulbs to power their flash units. After all, xenon flash units were by far the most common light source for digital cameras, and remain so today. But most manufacturers realised LEDs have qualities more suited to phones:

  • LED flash units use very little power. Xenon flashes require more battery power than LEDs to work effectively.
  • LEDs are robust thanks to an epoxy resin over the chips. Xenon flashes have fragile glass tubes.
  • LED circuitry fits into a tiny space. Xenon flashes take up much more room than LEDs.
  • LEDs can flash instantly. Xenon flashes require time to charge.

Phone manufacturers pack as much technology into as small an area as they can. They want to conserve battery power, and they need a durable product.

The low energy consumption, small size, toughness and reliability of LEDs make them the best choice for camera phones.

LEDs and developing technology

For their part, lighting manufacturers may sell millions of LEDs for camera phones, but they continue striving to improve quality.

White-light technology, for instance, helps create brighter, sharper pictures. And developments such as “off-state white” ensure LEDs have a white or neutral colour when not in use. This blends with the overall design of a mobile phone.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *